State v. Nicholson  ·  2024-02-22  ·  Ohio Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 605 N.E.2d at 597

“A prosecutor can legitimately refer to the facts and the nature and circumstances of the offense, to refute any suggestion they are mitigating or to demonstrate why aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating factors”

State v. Smith  ·  2020-10-26  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 605 N.E.2d at 597

“The appellate court must examine the error asserted by the defendant-appellant in light of all of the evidence”

State v. Sowell  ·  2020-05-14  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 605 N.E.2d at 597

“mere alcoholism or other addictions, voluntary drunkenness and drug use are not mitigating factors.”

State v. Ratcliffe  ·  2019-02-01  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 605 N.E.2d at 597

“The appellate court must examine the error asserted by the defendant-appellant in light of all of the evidence”

State v. Dyer  ·  2017-02-06  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 605 N.E.2d at 597

“[a]s a general rule an appellate court will not consider an alleged error that the complaining party did not bring to the trial court’s attention at the time the alleged error is said to have occurred”

State v. Mullins  ·  2016-08-18  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 605 N.E.2d at 597

“The appellate court must examine the error asserted by the defendant-appellant in light of all of the evidence”

State v. Plymale  ·  2016-06-03  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 605 N.E.2d at 597

“The appellate court must examine the error asserted by the defendant-appellant in light of all of the evidence”