Cases pin-citing Barbara J. Kemp v. International Business Machines Corporation · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Barbara J. Kemp v. International Business Machines Corporation

Cases pin-citing Barbara J. Kemp v. International Business Machines Corporation

Barbara J. Kemp v. International Business Machines Corporation  ·  1997  ·  22 pinpoint citations from 22 cases, 7 distinct passages.

Aaron J. West, M.D., P.A. v. Drago  ·  2025-09-18  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. v. Preferred Care Network, Inc.  ·  2025-07-28  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“If the plaintiff elects to bring only state law causes of action in state court, no federal question will appear in the complaint that could satisfy the well-pleaded complaint rule, and the case may not be removed to federal court.”
Nikita Griffin v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated  ·  2025-03-28  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of the plaintiff's com- plaint.”
Mortgage Lenders Investment Trading Corporation v. Vereen  ·  2024-09-25  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Montanez v. Gagosian  ·  2024-06-12  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Gillespie v. Google LLC  ·  2024-03-26  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Waters v. Rockett  ·  2024-03-18  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Rogers v. Jackson  ·  2024-02-12  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Timm  ·  2024-01-11  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiffs complaint.”
Independence RV Sales & Services, Inc v. Claudia Morales Mejias  ·  2023-08-31  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Tah MS Borrower LLC v. Faranzua  ·  2023-08-16  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Country Dreams, LLC v. Mejias  ·  2023-07-10  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
The Williams Family v. Kids First of Florida  ·  2023-05-09  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Ruiz v. Ringling College of Art and Design, Inc.  ·  2023-02-17  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint”
Jerlyn Global, LLC v. Lockley  ·  2022-08-17  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Kennamer v. Marshall County, Alabama  ·  2022-07-14  ·  N.D. Alabama  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“If the plaintiff elects to bring only state law causes of action in state court, no federal question will appear in the complaint that could satisfy the well-pleaded complaint rule, and the case may not be removed to federal court.”
Tur v. Nettleton  ·  2022-04-26  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Sylvester v. USAA Federal Savings Bank  ·  2022-03-29  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Thompson v. Made to Move Inc.  ·  2021-10-07  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Conradis v. Geiger  ·  2021-09-17  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A case does not arise under federal law unless a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s complaint.”
State of Georgia ex rel. v. Elite Integrated Medical, LLC  ·  2021-04-12  ·  N.D. Georgia  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“A defendant may remove a case to federal court only if the district court would have had jurisdiction over the case had the case been brought there originally”
United States v. Robert Dale Gray  ·  1998-08-11  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  pin 109 F.3d at 708
“[T]wo drug transactions occurring on different days—albeit within the same week and in the same general location—constitute separate, unrelated offenses for purposes of sentencing under 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(A)[.]”