T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. William Persichetti  ·  2025-08-21  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“[U]ntil an oral pronouncement is memorialized, the trial judge has broad discretion to amend, alter, or completely change his decision, and any discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment.”

In the Interest of M. B., a Child (Mother)  ·  2025-04-07  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“The decision about referring a recusal motion for reassignment to another judge does not involve an exercise of discretion by the judge whose recusal is sought.”

Debra Neil Blount v. Edward Victor Blount  ·  2024-10-10  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“[U]ntil an oral pronouncement is memorialized, the trial judge has broad discretion to amend, alter, or completely change his decision, and any discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written ruling”

State v. Devdan Yearwood-Cabbel  ·  2024-01-30  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“[U]ntil an oral pronouncement is memorialized, the trial judge has broad discretion to amend, alter, or completely change his decision, and any discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment.”

Rochelle Lagail Hodge v. State  ·  2023-07-27  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“[U]ntil an oral pronouncement is memorialized, the trial judge has broad discretion to amend, alter, or completely change his decision, and any discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment.”

In Re Francys Johnson  ·  2022-06-30  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“A decision by a trial judge to hold someone in contempt of court. . . is not just ‘administrative’; it is a ruling that has substantive consequences for the contemnor, which may include . . . incarceration, as well as collateral consequences such as professional discipline.”

Burns v. State  ·  2022-03-08  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“Moreover, until an oral pronouncement is memorialized, the trial judge has broad discretion to amend, alter, or completely change his decision, and any discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment.”

Burns v. State  ·  2022-03-08  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“Moreover, until an oral pronouncement is memorialized, the trial judge has broad discretion to amend, alter, or completely change his decision, and any discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment.”

E.amanda Dellinger-Allen v. Allison O'Brien  ·  2020-07-13  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“any discrepancy between [an] oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment”

State v. MONDOR (And Vice Versa)  ·  2019-06-28  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

“[A]ny discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment.”

State v. Mondor  ·  2019-06-28  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 815 S.E.2d at 70

"[A]ny discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written ruling will be resolved in favor of the written judgment."