Cases pin-citing Thompson
Thompson v. State · 2018 · 11 pinpoint citations from 11 cases, 4 distinct passages.
Lecharles Jacoby Harrell v. State
· 2025-04-30 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Given [a witness’s] inconsistent testimony at trial and her convenient memory lapses about the portions of her conversation with the police that implicated Appellant, her earlier statements were not hearsay but rather were properly admitted as prior inconsistent statements.”
Darrell Eugene Younger v. State
· 2023-02-09 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”
Dennis Leon Rozier v. State
· 2022-08-26 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Given [a witness’s] inconsistent testimony at trial and her convenient memory lapses about the portions of her conversation with the police that implicated Appellant, her earlier statements were not hearsay but rather were properly admitted as prior inconsistent statements.”
Kevin Chad Hardy v. State
· 2022-04-25 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“To establish plain error, [an a]ppellant must identify an error that was not affirmatively waived, was clear and not open to reasonable dispute, likely affected the outcome of the proceeding, and seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
Demetrius Tyrone Wicker v. State
· 2022-03-14 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”
John R. Nashid v. State
· 2021-12-30 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”
Terrence Powell v. State
· 2020-03-05 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”
Anton J. Smith v. State
· 2019-12-24 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”
Anton J. Smith v. State
· 2019-12-24 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”
Anton J. Smith v. State
· 2018-11-01 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”
Randall William Nowill, Sr. v. State
· 2018-09-26 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · pin 816 S.E.2d at 646
“In Georgia, a grand jury indictment must be returned in open court, and the failure to do so is per se injurious to the defendant.”