Gray v. State  ·  2024-05-14  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 827 S.E.2d at 892

“[i]t is . . . universally conceded that the fact of an accused’s flight, escape from custody, resistance to arrest, concealment, assumption of a false name, and related conduct [is] admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt, and thus of guilt itself”

State v. Nyah Kenyata Harnett  ·  2023-04-26  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 827 S.E.2d at 892

“the application of Rule 403 calls for a careful, case-by-case analysis, not a categorical approach”

Craig Stephen Rider v. State  ·  2022-12-02  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 827 S.E.2d at 892

“Where rules in the new Evidence Code are materially identical to Federal Rules of Evidence, we look to federal appellate law . . . to interpret them, instead of following our own precedent issued under the old Evidence Code.”

Jenkins v. State  ·  2022-01-19  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 305 Ga. at 729

“Flight is viewed in the law of evidence as admission by conduct which expresses consciousness of guilt.”

Quincy A. Smith v. State  ·  2020-06-17  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 827 S.E.2d at 892

“[D]ue process under the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the government from using, for impeachment purposes, evidence that the defendant exercised his right to remain silent after he was arrested and advised of his right to remain silent pursuant to Miranda.”

Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. v. Adrian Johns  ·  2019-06-28  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 827 S.E.2d at 892

"[E]xclusion of evidence under Rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy that should be used only sparingly to prohibit matter of scant or cumulative probative force, dragged in by the heels for the sake of its prejudicial effect."