Sterling v. Feek  ·  2025-09-04  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 161 F.3d at 584

“The Ninth Circuit has long held that applicants have a property interest protectible under the Due Process Clause where the regulations establishing entitlement to the benefit are, as here, mandatory in nature.”

Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus  ·  2024-08-22  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 161 F.3d at 584

“The threshold question is whether Foss has a constitutionally protectible property interest in acquiring an IFQ permit . . ..”

Fishermen's Finest, Inc. v. United States  ·  2021-08-27  ·  Federal Claims  ·  pin 161 F.3d at 584

“[T]he language of the Magnuson Act does not confer any claim of entitlement or property rights.”