City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.  ·  2005-04-27  ·  E.D. New York  ·  pin 202 F.3d at 502

“[T]he injunction that was issued in this case provided only prospective relief.... Since it did no more than avoid [a] continuing harm ... there is no retroactivity problem.”

Omega S.A. v. Omega Engineering, Inc.  ·  2002-10-18  ·  D. Connecticut  ·  pin 202 F.3d at 502

“Similarly, the injunction that was issued in this case provided only prospective relief to Sportsman’s. Since it did no more than avoid the continuing harm that would result from Sporty’s Farm’s use [of] the domain name, there is no retroactivity problem.”