Young Israel of Tampa, Inc. v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority  ·  2024-01-10  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  pin 495 F.3d at 1289

“We need not delve far into philosophy, however, because the Supreme Court has at least twice instructed us not to engage in any ‘objective’ test of whether a par- ticular belief is a religious one.”

Alvarez v. APLM Services  ·  2022-11-01  ·  S.D. Georgia  ·  pin 495 F.3d at 1289

“The Court has instructed us that the [12(b)(6)] rule ‘does not impose a probability requirement at the pleading stage,’ but instead ‘simply calls for enough fact to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of’ the necessary element.”

Andrew Harley Speaker v. U.S. Dept. of HHS  ·  2010-10-22  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  pin 495 F.3d at 1289

“The Court has instructed us that the rule ‘does not impose a probability requirement at the pleading stage,’ but instead ‘simply calls for enough fact to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of’ the necessary element.”