Cases pin-citing Emerson v. Thiel College · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Emerson v. Thiel College

Cases pin-citing Emerson v. Thiel College

Emerson v. Thiel College  ·  2002  ·  16 pinpoint citations from 15 cases, 9 distinct passages.

LEE v. ELECTRIFAI, LLC  ·  2024-09-13  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“[I]ndividual employees are not liable under Title VII”
MURRAY v. COUNTY OF HUDSON  ·  2023-10-13  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“individual employees are not liable under Title VII”
HERRING v. OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES  ·  2023-09-25  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“individual employees are not liable under Title VII”
QUICK v. UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA  ·  2023-07-20  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“With respect to [plaintiffs] personal responsibility, the District Court recognized that because [plaintiff] is proceeding pro se, his failure to comply with its orders could not be blamed on counsel.”
SOUTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS  ·  2023-06-28  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“Because the individual defendants do not receive federal aid, Emerson does not state a claim against them under the Rehabilitation Act.”
Brown v. United States  ·  2022-03-30  ·  D. Delaware  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“Because the individual defendants do not receive federal aid, Emerson does not state a claim against them under the Rehabilitation Act.”
Ismail v. Honeywell International Inc.  ·  2022-03-17  ·  M.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“[I]ndividual employees are not liable under Title VII.”
CARTER v. AMAZON ACY1  ·  2021-09-30  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“[I]ndividual employees are not liable under Title VII.”
WILKES v. SCI ALBION  ·  2021-05-18  ·  W.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“Because the individual defendants do not receive federal aid, Emerson does not state a claim against them under the Rehabilitation Act.”
HOLDEN v. WETZEL  ·  2021-03-22  ·  W.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“Because the individual defendants do not receive federal aid, Emerson does not state a claim against them under the Rehabilitation Act.”
WASHINGTON v. MALMUD  ·  2020-10-20  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“[I]ndividual employees are not liable under Title VII.”
Kutty v. Sap America, Inc.  ·  2020-02-10  ·  E.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“individual employees are not liable under Title VII”
TALLEY v. IONATA  ·  2019-09-05  ·  E.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“Because the individual defendants do not receive federal aid, [plaintiff] does not state a claim against them under the Rehabilitation Act.”
EVERETT v. FIELDWORKS, LLC  ·  2019-08-22  ·  W.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“Emerson proceeded in forma pauperis in District Court. We agree that monetary sanctions would not be an effective alternative.”
Taylor v. Altoona Area School District  ·  2007-08-23  ·  W.D. Pennsylvania  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 296 F.3d at 184
“Applying these definitions, we hold that the individual college defendants and Brown do not operate Thiel and thus are not subject to individual liability under Title III of the ADA.”