Cases pin-citing cluster 779197 · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing cluster 779197

Cases pin-citing cluster 779197

 ·  2002  ·  14 pinpoint citations from 13 cases, 8 distinct passages.

Fowler v. Tenth Planet, Inc.  ·  2024-08-09  ·  D. Maryland  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“There is no express statutory authority in the ADEA or the FLSA to award expert witness fees for other than court-appointed expert witnesses. The district court did not err in refusing to award the Plaintiffs expert witness fees.”
University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Jackie Aycock and Debra Aycock  ·  2023-08-17  ·  Mississippi Supreme Court  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“The equitable estoppel inquiry involves questions of fact and law.”
Gaudet v. Howard L. Nations, APC  ·  2022-07-29  ·  E.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“Unocal instead attempts to show that the underlying data – provided by Unocal – was itself unreliable. This is an issue that Unocal could – and did – raise in cross- examination.”
Gaudet v. Howard L. Nations, APC  ·  2022-07-29  ·  E.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“Unocal instead attempts to show that the underlying data – provided by Unocal – was itself unreliable. This is an issue that Unocal could – and did – raise in cross-examination.”
Gaudet v. Howard L. Nations, APC  ·  2022-07-29  ·  E.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“Unocal instead attempts to show that the underlying data – provided by Unocal – was itself unreliable. This is an issue that Unocal could – and did – raise in cross- examination.”
Sandlin v. Urbina  ·  2022-03-04  ·  M.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“Unocal instead attempts to show that the underlying data—provided by Unocal—was itself unreliable. This is an issue that Unocal could—and did—raise in cross- examination.”
MGMTL, LLC v. Strategic Technology Institute, Inc.  ·  2022-02-17  ·  E.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“Unocal instead attempts to show that the underlying data – provided by Unocal – was itself unreliable. This is an issue that Unocal could – and did – raise in cross-examination.”
MGMTL, LLC v. Strategic Technology Institute, Inc.  ·  2022-02-16  ·  E.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“Unocal instead attempts to show that the underlying data – provided by Unocal – was itself unreliable. This is an issue that Unocal could – and did – raise in cross-examination.”
Stewart v. Quality Carriers, Inc.  ·  2021-06-30  ·  M.D. Louisiana  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“Unocal instead attempts to show that the underlying data—provided by Unocal—was itself unreliable. This is an issue that Unocal could—and did—raise in cross- examination.”
Deljavan v. Goodwill Industries of Fort Worth  ·  2021-05-28  ·  N.D. Texas  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“In a disparate treatment case ... a plaintiff must produce sufficient evidence to rebut a showing by the employer that there was a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for [differentially treating] a particular employee.”
Degarmo v. C. R. Bard, Inc.  ·  2018-02-02  ·  S.D. West Virginia  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“[Tlhe reliability of data underlying an expert’s opinion goes to the weight of this evidence, but should not serve as a basis for its exclusion.”
Stephenson v. C. R. Bard, Inc.  ·  2018-01-31  ·  S.D. West Virginia  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
“[T]he reliability of data underlying an expert’s opinion goes to the weight of this evidence, but should not serve as a basis for its exclusion.”
Smith v. City of Jackson MS  ·  2003-12-05  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 304 F.3d at 379
"In a disparate treatment case ... a plaintiff must produce sufficient evidence to rebut a showing by the employer that there was a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for [differentially treating] a particular employee."