NVME Group, Inc. v. Halverson  ·  2024-05-28  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“A motion to dismiss should not be 9 granted unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his 10 claim that would entitle him to relief.”

Kransky v. Gigliotti  ·  2024-04-03  ·  D. Montana  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“The [FTCA] does not permit suits against the United States for defamation”

McKenzie v. Social Security Administration  ·  2024-01-22  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“The United States, including 8 its agencies and its employees, can be sued only to the extent that it has expressly waived its 9 sovereign immunity.”

Harper v. Department of Interior  ·  2022-02-11  ·  D. Idaho  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“The [FTCA] does not permit suits against the United States for defamation”

Harper v. Department of Interior  ·  2021-11-12  ·  D. Idaho  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“The [FTCA] does not permit suits against the United States for defamation”

MAZO v. WAY  ·  2021-07-30  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“[I]t is the job of democratically-elected representatives to weigh the pros and cons of various balloting systems.”

George Richardson v. Texas Secretary of Sta  ·  2020-10-19  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“[I]t is the job of democratically-elected representatives to weigh the pros and cons of various balloting systems.”

Ohio Democratic Party v. Jon Husted  ·  2016-08-23  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 347 F.3d at 1107

“[I]t is the job of democratically-elected representatives to weigh the pros and cons of various balloting systems. So long as their choice is reasonable and neutral, it is free from judicial second-guessing.”