Cases pin-citing Penn West Associates, Inc. v. Cohen

Penn West Associates, Inc. v. Cohen · 2004 · 5 pinpoint citations from 5 cases, 3 distinct passages.

Herod v. DMS Solutions Inc · 2025-07-15 · S.D. Texas · pin 371 F.3d at 118

“[A]n order merely directing that a case be marked closed constitutes an administrative closing that has no legal consequence other than to remove that case from the district court’s active docket.”

VERTIV, INC. v. WAYNE BURT · 2021-07-23 · D. New Jersey · pin 371 F.3d at 118

“’Rule 60(b) must be limited to review of orders that are independently ‘final decisions’ under 28 U.S.C. § 1291’”

RODRIGUES v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. · 2020-01-16 · D. New Jersey · pin 371 F.3d at 118

“Rule 60(b) must be limited to review of orders that are independently ‘final decisions’ under 28 U.S.C. § 1291”

MZM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. v. NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS · 2019-08-14 · D. New Jersey · pin 371 F.3d at 118

“Rule 60(b) must be limited to review of orders that are independently ‘final decisions’ under 28 U.S.C. § 1291”

Dees v. Billy · 2005-01-18 · Ninth Circuit · pin 371 F.3d at 118

“an order merely directing that a case be marked closed constitutes an administrative closing that has no legal consequence other than to remove that case from the district court’s active docket”