State v. Samuels  ·  2003-03-25  ·  Connecticut Appellate Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 244 A.2d at 640

“ ‘[Tjrial court has wide discretion to determine the relevancy of evidence and the scope of cross-examination. Every reasonable presumption should be made in favor of the correctness of the court’s ruling in determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion.’ ”