Cases pin-citing cluster 792691
· 2005 · 5 pinpoint citations from 5 cases, 4 distinct passages.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
· 2022-03-22 · W.D. Virginia · pin 431 F.3d at 643
“absent statutory direction to the contrary, a district court validly exercises its jurisdiction over actions ‘arising under’ federal laws.”
Charles Lima v. U.S. Department of Education
· 2020-01-13 · Ninth Circuit · pin 431 F.3d at 643
“At its core, due process requires that a party have adequate notice and opportunity to be heard.”
Charles Lima v. U.S. Department of Education
· 2019-12-18 · Ninth Circuit · pin 431 F.3d at 643
“At its core, due process requires that a party have adequate notice and opportunity to be heard.”
United States v. Dell
· 2012-06-28 · Tenth Circuit · pin 431 F.3d at 643
“[The] simple act of walking away from the officers could not have been reasonably mistaken for the type of ‘flight’ the officers confronted in Wardlow.”
In the Interest of J.D.C.
· 2007-06-08 · Supreme Court of Kansas · pin 431 F.3d at 643
“In the context of a civil suit ‘cross-examination is not, in every instance, a sine qua non of due process. It all depends on the situation.’ ”