Cases pin-citing Montclair · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Montclair

Cases pin-citing Montclair

Montclair v. Ramsdell  ·  1883  ·  38 pinpoint citations from 14 cases, 8 distinct passages.

David Failla v. Citibank, N.A.  ·  2016-10-04  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a stat-ute_”
Si Min Cen v. Attorney General United States  ·  2016-06-06  ·  Third Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute[.]”
Powell v. System Transport Inc.  ·  2015-01-26  ·  D. Oregon  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute, avoiding, if it may be, any construction which implies that the legislature was ignorant of the meaning and language it employed”
William Ellington v. City of East Cleveland  ·  2012-08-06  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute, avoiding, if it may be, any construction which implies that the legislature was ignorant of the meaning of the language it employed.”
American Airlines, Inc. v. Transportation Security Administration  ·  2011-12-06  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute.... ”
Wolfchild v. United States  ·  2010-12-21  ·  Federal Claims  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute.”
Roberto v. Ortiz v. Eric K. Shinseki  ·  2010-03-03  ·  Veterans Claims  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute, avoiding, if it may be, any construction which implies that the legislature was ignorant of the meaning of the language it employed.”
United States v. Alghazouli  ·  2008-03-04  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute, avoiding, if it may be, any construction which implies that the legislature was ignorant of the meaning of the language it employed.”
Jeffery A. Wells v. Anthony J. Principi  ·  2004-05-11  ·  Veterans Claims  ·  pin 107 U.S. at 147
"[i]t is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute, avoiding, if it may be, any construction which implies that the legislature was ignorant of the meaning of the language it employed"
Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States  ·  2004-04-07  ·  Federal Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute.... ”
The Shoshone Indian Tribe Of The Wind River Reservation v. United States  ·  2004-04-07  ·  Federal Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
"It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute...."
Lariosa v. Principi  ·  2002-09-17  ·  Veterans Claims  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 107 L. Ed. at 147
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute....”
Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United States  ·  1998-07-08  ·  Federal Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 2 L. Ed. at 391
“It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a stat-ute____”
Hortensia De Allende v. George P. Shultz, Secretary of State  ·  1988-04-13  ·  First Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 27 L. Ed. at 431
"It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute, avoiding, if it may be, any construction which implies that the legislature was ignorant of the meaning of the language it employed."