Pederson v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.  ·  2020-07-26  ·  D. Minnesota  ·  pin 139 S. Ct. at 1289

“[W]e conclude that the statutory definition of ATDS is not limited to devices with the capacity to call numbers produced by a ‘random or sequential number generator’ but also includes devices with the capacity to dial stored numbers automatically.”

Pederson v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.  ·  2020-06-08  ·  D. Minnesota  ·  pin 139 S. Ct. at 1289

“[W]e conclude that the statutory definition of ATDS is not limited to devices with the capacity to call numbers produced by a ‘random or sequential number generator’ but also includes devices with the capacity to dial stored numbers automatically.”

Pascal v. Arms  ·  2019-10-24  ·  N.D. California  ·  pin 139 S. Ct. at 1289

“In a series of rulings, from 2003 to 2015, the FCC 9 determined that predictive dialers and other new technology qualified as an ATDS, even if they 10 did not generally generate or store random or sequential numbers.”