Cases pin-citing Gompers · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Gompers

Cases pin-citing Gompers

Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.  ·  1911  ·  31 pinpoint citations from 14 cases, 10 distinct passages.

Trump v. CASA, Inc. Revisions: 7/02/25  ·  2025-06-27  ·  Supreme Court  ·  pin 221 U.S. at 418
“Proceedings for civil contempt are between the original par- ties”
Trump v. CASA, Inc. Revisions: 6/27/25  ·  2025-06-27  ·  Supreme Court  ·  pin 221 U.S. at 418
“Proceedings for civil contempt are between the original par- ties”
Trump v. CASA, Inc. Revisions: 6/27/25  ·  2025-06-27  ·  Supreme Court  ·  pin 221 U.S. at 418
“Proceedings for civil contempt are between the original par- ties”
Trump v. CASA, Inc.  ·  2025-06-27  ·  Supreme Court  ·  pin 221 U.S. at 418
“Proceedings for civil contempt are between the original par- ties”
United States America v. Simmons  ·  2025-03-11  ·  E.D. Michigan  ·  pin 221 U.S. at 418
“[Civil contempt’s] primary purposes are to compel obedience to a court order and compensate for injuries caused by noncompliance.”
Ahearn v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Locals 21 & 4  ·  2013-07-05  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 221 L. Ed. at 418
“Proceedings for civil contempt are between the original parties, and are instituted and tried as a part of the main cause.”
In The Matter of: Judge William M. Watkins, III  ·  2013-03-26  ·  West Virginia Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 221 L. Ed. at 418
“[T]he very amplitude of [inherent] power is a warning to use it with discretion, and a command never to exert it where it is not necessary or proper.”
Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. v. Salazar  ·  2012-11-27  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 221 L. Ed. at 418
“[T]he [contempt] power has been uniformly held to be necessary ... to enable [the Judiciary] to enforce its judgments and orders necessary to the due administration of law and the protection of the rights of citizens.”
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Chuckleberry Publishing, Inc.  ·  1996-07-16  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 55 L. Ed. at 797
“[W]hen a court imposes fines and punishments on a eontemnor, it is not only vindicating its legal authority to enter the initial court order, but it also is seeking to give effect to the law’s purpose of modifying the contemnor’s behavior to conform to the terms required in the order.”
New York v. Terry  ·  1995-01-05  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 221 L. Ed. at 418
“the power of courts to punish for contempts is a necessary and integral part of the independence of the judiciary”
People v. Terry  ·  1995-01-05  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 221 L. Ed. at 418
"the power of courts to punish for contempts is a necessary and integral part of the independence of the judiciary"
United States v. Cutler  ·  1994-01-07  ·  E.D. New York  ·  pin 55 L. Ed. at 797
“If a party can make himself a judge of the validity of orders which have been issued, and by his own act of disobedience set them aside, then are the courts impotent, and what the Constitution now fittingly calls the ‘judicial power of the United States’ would be a mere mockery.”
Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, San Diego, California, United States of America v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez  ·  1988-09-15  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  6 pin-cites  ·  pin 221 L. Ed. at 418
"the power of courts to punish for contempts is a necessary and integral part of the independence of the judiciary, and is absolutely essential to the performance of the duties imposed on them by law"
United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago  ·  1984-07-17  ·  N.D. Illinois  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 221 L. Ed. at 418
"he carries the keys of his prison in his own pocket"