§ 901.02, Fla. Stat. — Leading Cases | Syfert Law

Leading cases: § 901.02, Fla. Stat.

Cited in 37 cases (0 in the last 5 years, 1944–2019). ← Read the statute text
Mobley v. State (2016) fladistctapp · cites it 7× “” § 901.02 (emphasis added). The State does not argue that the violations of probation that were alleged in the affidavit (failure to make various payments) were “crimes.”
Williams v. State (2016) fladistctapp · cites it 6× “” § 901.02 (emphasis added). The State does not argue that the violations of probation that were alleged in the affidavit (failure to make various payments) were “crimes.”
Crain v. State (2005) fladistctapp · cites it 5× “Because section 901.02, Florida Statutes, specifically governs the issuance of arrest warrants, section 948.”
Commonwealth v. Almonor (2019) mass “02"> Fla. Stat. §§ 901.02 (3) -(4), 933.”
Aponte v. State (2005) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “See § 901.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2002) ("A warrant is issued at the time it is signed by the magistrate.”
Amend. to Rules of App. Proc., Civ. Proc. (2004) fla · cites it 2× “(a) This is substantially the same as section 901.02, Florida Statutes, except that the rule requires a written complaint.”
Bartlett v. State (2008) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “; § 901.02, Fla. Stat. (2006); Fla. R.Crim.”
Howard v. State (2004) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “" § 901.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). The transcript of the April 25, 2003 hearing reveals a possibility that an amended affidavit of violation of probation was filed before the hearing.”
State v. Boyd (1998) fla · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] Section 901.02, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: A warrant may be issued for the arrest of the person complained against if the magistrate, from the examination of the complainant and other witnesses, reasonably believes that the person complained against has…”
In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc. (1992) fla · cites it 2× “(a) This is substantially the same as section 901.02, Florida Statutes, except that the rule requires a written complaint.”
Perez v. State (1993) fla “See generally §§ 901.02, .15, Fla. Stat. (1989). A temporary investigative stop, on the other hand, is permissible where police have a reasonable suspicion — i.”
Slingbaum v. State (1999) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “See § 901.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). The change, however, is prospective only and has no effect on the resolution of this case.”
Sepulveda v. State (2005) fladistctapp “Under section 901.02(1), the warrant is issued when the judge signs it.”
McNeal v. State (1999) fladistctapp · cites it 3× “" Although the language of the amendment itself does not indicate whether the chapter law is to be applied retroactively, the staff analysis expressly states that the amendment will affect future cases only: The first amendment [to section 901.02] changes this result in future…”
Burns v. GCC Beverages, Inc. (1985) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “If a magistrate permits an arrest warrant to issue, without examination of the complainant or other witnesses, and fails to satisfy himself to a reasonable belief that the person complained against has committed the offense, as required by Section 901.02, Florida Statutes, the…”
Rodriguez v. State (2009) fladistctapp “See § 901.02(2). Nothing in our case law limits investigatory stops to situations in which the officer has a well-founded suspicion of an offense for which the officer could effect an immediate arrest.”
State of Florida v. Flem Williams (2018) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “At a hearing on this motion, the State conceded that Mobley required that the affidavit be dismissed, but urged the trial court to “recede” from Mobley because it improperly interpreted section 901.02, Florida Statutes, as it is cited in section 948.”
Morgan v. State (2000) fladistctapp “Under § 901.02(1), Florida Statutes (1999), which is prospective in application, a warrant is issued when the judge signs it.”
Hennig v. William G. Prummel, Jr., Sheriff of Charlotte County (2015) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “§ 901.02(4), Fla. Stat. (2014); see also Morgan v.”
Murphy v. State (1993) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “In his motion for reconsideration, the defendant makes no contention that the subject arrest warrant was issued without probable cause or was otherwise legally defective as to form, see § 901.02, Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P.”