Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02
Snippet: v. Digit Dirt Worx, Inc., 793 Fed. App’x 896, 901–02 (11th Cir. 2019) (citing Beaird v. Seagate Tech
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-29
Snippet: are police officers.”); Brooks, 762 So. 2d at 901–02 (finding improper vouching due to statements suggesting
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-06-10
Snippet: arrival, leave with small packages in tow. Id. at 901–02. One of the individuals observed by the officers
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-03-09
Snippet: the existence of the defense.”); see also § 733.901(2), Fla. Stat. (2020); Sims v. Barnard, 257 So. 3d
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-08-14
Snippet: legal analysis of the attorneys involved. Id. at 901- 02. The Florida Supreme Court explained: Requiring
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-07
Citation: 273 So. 3d 1161
Snippet: 2d DCA 2016); Heiny v. Heiny, 113 So. 3d 897, 901-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Pignataro v. Rutledge, 841
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-27
Citation: 262 So. 3d 842
Snippet: 06(1)(f) is clear that a warrant under section 901.02 is required in order for the probationary period
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-27
Citation: 262 So. 3d 842
Snippet: 06(1)(f) is clear that a warrant under section 901.02 is required in order for the probationary period
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-27
Snippet: 06(1)(f) is clear that a warrant under section 901.02 is required in order for the probationary period
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-10
Citation: 261 So. 3d 676
Snippet: chosen to do so. See, e.g., Andrews, 243 So. 3d at 901-02 (“Requiring a defendant to reveal . . . the name
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-05
Citation: 260 So. 3d 472
Snippet: Mobley because it improperly interpreted section 901.02, Florida Statutes, as it is cited in section 948
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-06
Citation: 257 So. 3d 630
Snippet: to the trial court’s application of section 733.901(2) were undisputed. Upon stipulation of the parties
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-01
Snippet: and knew how to use the city bus system. Id. at 901-02. All of that evidence cuts against a finding of
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-15
Snippet: Mobley because it improperly interpreted section 901.02, Florida Statutes, as it is cited in section 948
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-27
Citation: 256 So. 3d 766
Snippet: use the city bus system. Id. at 901-02 . All of that evidence cuts against a finding
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-07
Citation: 255 So. 3d 442
Snippet: by (1) the "issuance of a warrant under s.901.02," (2) "a warrantless arrest under [section
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-13
Citation: 250 So. 3d 156
Snippet: LLC v. Duke Realty Ltd. P’ship, 45 So. 3d 897, 901-02 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (oral modifications permitted
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-03-14
Citation: 244 So. 3d 339
Snippet: and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02, a warrantless arrest under this section, or a
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-09-26
Citation: 227 So. 3d 550
Snippet: discover until now. Lambrix, 124 So.3d at 901-02 (citations omitted) (emphasis added). Thus, Lambrix
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-08
Citation: 219 So. 3d 49, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 2017 WL 2481225, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1277, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8449
Snippet: be fully compensated for those losses.” Id. at 901-02. Additionally, the plurality opinion described