15 U.S.C. § 1173 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 15 U.S.C. § 1173

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 39 citation events across 16 distinct cases.
39citations total
16distinct interpreting cases
13distinct courts
1citations in last 5y
1953–2024year range
Top 12 leading cases
#1 United States v. Howard (Ted) Furkin (1997) ca7 58 own cites 3× in case
#2 United States v. Various Gambling Devices, A. B. Fort, Claimant-Appellant (1973) ca5 28 own cites 4× in case
#3 United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) Draw Poker-Type MacHines & Six (6) Slot MacHines (1984) ohnd 7 own cites 7× in case
#4 United States v. 5 Gambling Devices (1972) lawd 7 own cites 4× in case
#5 People Ex Rel. Waller v. Seeburg Slot MacHines (1994) illappct 8 own cites 2× in case
#6 United States v. 294 Various Gambling Devices (1989) pawd 21 own cites 1× in case
#7 United States v. Various Gambling Devices (1973) msnd 5 own cites 2× in case
#8 United States v. Denmark (1953) gasd 5 own cites 5× in case
#9 United States v. Two (2) Quarter Fall MacHines (1991) tned 2 own cites 3× in case
#10 United States v. Various Gambling Devices (1972) msnd 3 own cites 1× in case
#11 TAC Amusement Co. v. Mitchell (1971) laed 3 own cites 1× in case
#12 United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) Draw Poker-Type Machines and Six (6) Slot Machines (1985) ca6 1 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.