20 C.F.R. § 1002.248 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 20 C.F.R. § 1002.248

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 18 citation events across 13 distinct cases.
18citations total
13distinct interpreting cases
10distinct courts
1citations in last 5y
2006–2022year range
Top 8 leading cases
#1 Cheryl P. Francis v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Incorporated, Reserve Officers Association, Amicus Supporting (2006) ca4 210 own cites 1× in case
#2 Rademacher v. HBE Corp. (2011) ca8 35 own cites 2× in case
#3 Vahey v. General Motors Company (2013) dcd 10 own cites 4× in case
#4 To v. U.S. Bancorp (2011) ca8 20 own cites 2× in case
#5 Hanson v. County of Kitsap (2014) wawd 20 own cites 1× in case
#6 Starr v. Quicktrip Corporation (2016) ca10 9 own cites 1× in case
#7 Mace v. Willis (2017) sdd 8 own cites 1× in case
#8 Johnson v. Michigan Claim Service, Inc. (2007) mnd 2 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.