20 C.F.R. § 676.90 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 20 C.F.R. § 676.90

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 16 citation events across 12 distinct cases.
16citations total
12distinct interpreting cases
8distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
1982–1989year range
Top 12 leading cases
#1 State of Maine, Office of Maine Ceta v. The United States Department of Labor (1982) ca1 17 own cites 3× in case
#2 McCulty v. Rockefeller (1983) wvsd 5 own cites 3× in case
#3 Oakland County Board of Commissioners v. United States Department of Labor (1988) ca6 17 own cites 1× in case
#4 Onslow County, North Carolina v. United States Department of Labor (1985) ca4 15 own cites 1× in case
#5 Action, Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary, United States Department of Labor (1986) ca10 13 own cites 1× in case
#6 Quechan Indian Tribe v. United States Department of Labor (1984) ca9 12 own cites 1× in case
#7 Franklin County Employment and Training Administration v. James Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor (1983) ca2 11 own cites 1× in case
#8 Colorado Department of Labor and Employment v. United States Department of Labor (1989) ca10 6 own cites 1× in case
#9 Mobile Consortium of Ceta, Alabama v. United States Department of Labor (1984) ca11 5 own cites 1× in case
#10 Arizona Department of Economic Security v. U.S. Dept. Of Labor (1986) ca9 4 own cites 1× in case
#11 Pierce County v. United States ex rel. Department of Labor (1983) ca9 4 own cites 1× in case
#12 Pierce County v. United States (1983) ca9 1 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.