29 C.F.R. § 102.1 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 29 C.F.R. § 102.1

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 9 citation events across 8 distinct cases.
9citations total
8distinct interpreting cases
7distinct courts
2citations in last 5y
1985–2023year range
Top 6 leading cases
#1 Casino Pauma v. NLRB (2018) ca9 12 own cites 2× in case
#2 Vane v. Nocella (1985) md 14 own cites 1× in case
#3 Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Ramette (In Re HLM Corp.) (1994) mnd 11 own cites 1× in case
#4 NLRB v. Neises Construction Corporatio (2023) ca7 7 own cites 1× in case
#5 National Labor Relations Board v. Frazier (1992) njd 6 own cites 1× in case
#6 Aguinaga v. John Morrell & Co. (1988) ksd 2 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.