34 C.F.R. § 104.22 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 34 C.F.R. § 104.22

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 8 citation events across 5 distinct cases.
8citations total
5distinct interpreting cases
4distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
1990–2010year range
Top 5 leading cases
#1 Huezo v. Los Angeles Community College District (2008) cacd 5 own cites 4× in case
#2 Mary Schuldt and Douglas Schuldt, on Behalf of Themselves and Their Minor Daughter, Erika Schuldt v. Mankato Independent School, District No. 77 (1991) ca8 28 own cites 1× in case
#3 Greer v. Richardson Independent School District (2010) txnd 8 own cites 1× in case
#4 Pace v. Bogalusa City School Board (2003) ca5 23 own cites 1× in case
#5 Liddell v. Board of Education (1990) ca8 3 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.