Statute treatment: 48 C.F.R. § 14.405

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 37 citation events across 26 distinct cases.

37citations total

26distinct interpreting cases

8distinct courts

6citations in last 5y

1989–2025year range

Top 19 leading cases

#1 Centech Group, Inc. v. United States (2009) cafc 421 own cites 1× in case

#2 Aerolease Long Beach v. United States (1994) uscfc 66 own cites 2× in case

#3 USfalcon, Inc. v. United States (2010) uscfc 47 own cites 2× in case

#4 Knowledge Connections, Inc. v. United States (2007) uscfc 11 own cites 4× in case

#5 Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. v. United States (2003) uscfc 12 own cites 3× in case

#6 T Square Logistics Services Corporation v. United States (2017) uscfc 18 own cites 2× in case

#7 Interstate Rock Products, Inc. v. United States (2001) uscfc 18 own cites 2× in case

#8 Orion International Technologies v. United States (2005) uscfc 10 own cites 2× in case

#9 Irvin Industries Canada, Ltd. v. United States Air Force (1990) cadc 18 own cites 1× in case

#10 Oak Grove Technologies, LLC v. United States (2024) cafc 18 own cites 1× in case

#11 Hill Bros. Const. & Engineering Co. v. Mtc (2005) miss 17 own cites 1× in case

#12 Professional Building Concepts, Inc. v. City of Central Falls (1992) ca1 26 own cites 2× in case

#13 Honeywell, Inc. v. United States (1989) cc 11 own cites 1× in case

#14 Level 3 Communications, LLC v. United States (2016) uscfc 10 own cites 1× in case

#15 Linc Government Services, LLC v. United States (2012) uscfc 10 own cites 1× in case

#16 McMaster Construction, Inc. v. United States (1991) cc 7 own cites 1× in case

#17 NVT Technologies, Inc. v. United States (2006) uscfc 6 own cites 1× in case

#18 Walbridge Aldinger Co. v. City of Detroit (2008) ca6 2 own cites 1× in case

#19 Reeve Aleutian Airways, Inc. v. Rice (1992) dcd 1 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.