5 U.S.C. § 1082 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 5 U.S.C. § 1082

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 14 citation events across 10 distinct cases.
14citations total
10distinct interpreting cases
6distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
1958–1982year range
Top 9 leading cases
#1 Boyd v. Panama Canal Co. (1958) canalzoned 10 own cites 4× in case
#2 United States v. Clark (1982) scotus 113 own cites 1× in case
#3 Lester K. Born v. George v. Allen, Director, United States Information Agency (1960) cadc 14 own cites 2× in case
#4 Francesco Foti, A/K/A Frank Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1962) ca2 30 own cites 1× in case
#5 L. M. Daniels and Clayton G. Leonard v. The United States (1969) cc 27 own cites 1× in case
#6 National Maritime Union of America v. United States (1982) cc 19 own cites 1× in case
#7 Benevento v. United States (1972) cc 13 own cites 1× in case
#8 Harry J. Amell v. The United States (1968) cc 12 own cites 1× in case
#9 Descomp, Inc. v. Sampson (1974) ded 10 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.