Topic: he term 'including' is not one of all-embracing definition,… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1017

5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co. Anchor
scotus · 1941
green “he term 'including' is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle.” 11
2 Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.
scotus · 1941
green “he term 'including' is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle.” 5
3 Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.
scotus · 1941
green “the term 'including' is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle” 5
4 Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.
scotus · 1941
green “the term 'including' is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check