7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Arizona v. Mauro.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arizona v. Mauro Anchor | green | “officers do not interrogate a suspect simply by hoping that he will incriminate himself.” | 6 |
| 2 | Graham v. Florida | green | “evelopments in psychology and brain science continue to show fundamental differences between juvenile and adult minds.” | 6 |
| 3 | J. D. B. v. North Carolina | green | “reasonable child subjected to police questioning will sometimes feel pressured to submit when a reasonable adult would feel free to go.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Attebury | green | “to the extent that a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress involves an interpretation of the law or the application of a constitutional standard to uncontested facts, our review is de novo.” | 3 |
| 5 | State of Tennessee v. Marco M. Northern | green | “n a custodial setting, certain psychological ploys . . . are 'techniques of persuasion, no less than express questioning' which 'amount to interrogation.” | 3 |
| 6 | Hardy v. United States | green | “tatements which are obtained by coercion or threat or promise will be subject to objection.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Rivas | green | “practices identified as the functional equivalents of interrogation generally employ compelling influences or psychological ploys in tandem with police custody to obtain confessions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.