5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the Matter of Gene Reitnauer, Debtor. Gene Reitnauer v. Texas Exotic Feline Foundation, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the Matter of Gene Reitnauer, Debtor. Gene Reitnauer v. Texas Exotic Feline Foundation, Inc. Anchor | green | “it is true that (1) jurisdictional defects render a judgment void, and (2) void judgments are subject to collateral attack.” | 10 |
| 2 | Ileana Martinez-Garcia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | green | “the only charging document available after april 1, 1997, is the notice to appear.” | 6 |
| 3 | Deleon-Holguin v. Ashcroft | green | “emoval proceedings commence when the files the appropriate charging document with the immigration court.” | 4 |
| 4 | Deleon-Holguin v. Ashcroft | green | “emoval proceedings commence when the ins 6 files the appropriate charging document with the immigration court.” | 4 |
| 5 | Puc-Ruiz v. Holder | green | “when the lacks jurisdiction, decisions are nullities.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.