4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo Anchor | green | “the court has repeatedly held that the basis for injunctive relief in the federal courts has always been irreparable injury and the inadequacy of legal remedies.” | 11 |
| 2 | ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp. | green | “a plaintiff's past willingness to license its patent is not sufficient per se to establish a lack of irreparable harm if a new infringer were added.” | 3 |
| 3 | American Code Co. v. Bensinger | green | “in cases of infringement of copyright, an injunction has always been recognized as a proper remedy, because of the inadequacy of the legal remedy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.