5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. Com.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. Com Anchor | green | “ny activity that can be boiled down to deciding whether to exclude material that third parties seek to post online is perforce immune under section 230.” | 11 |
| 2 | Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc. | green | “emoving content is something publishers do, and to impose liability on the basis of such conduct necessarily involves treating the liable party as a publisher of the content it failed to remove.” | 5 |
| 3 | John Green v. America Online (Aol) John Does 1 & 2 | green | “ecisions relating to the monitoring, screening, and deletion of content" are "actions quintessentially related to a publisher's role.” | 3 |
| 4 | Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System | green | “he court need not accept legal conclusions as correct” | 3 |
| 5 | Dart v. Craigslist, Inc. | green | “plaintiff is simply wrong when he insists that are all synonyms for illegal sexual services.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.