6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from KAMEN SOAP PRODUCTS COMPANY v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMEN SOAP PRODUCTS COMPANY v. United States Anchor | green | “this statute goes further than merely banning fraudulent claims. it provides for a forfeiture of the claim if any fraud is practiced or attempted to be practiced in proving, establishing or allowing a claim.” | 6 |
| 2 | Kamen Soap Products Co. v. United States | green | “this statute goes further than merely banning fraudulent claims. it provides for a forfeiture of the claim if any fraud is practiced or attempted to be practiced in proving, establishing or allowing a claim.” | 5 |
| 3 | Riley Construction Co. v. United States | green | “mr. riley would have had reason to rely on douglas, the former navy roic, as an expert in submitting claims. such reliance, if it exists, may be relevant in considering the various counterclaims.” | 4 |
| 4 | Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States | green | “the contractor must knowingly present the false claim with the intention of being paid for it.” | 4 |
| 5 | Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States | green | “to prevail, the government must prove its allegations by clear and convincing evidence.” | 3 |
| 6 | UMC Electronics Co. v. United States | green | “under the false claims act there must be a showing by the government of more than innocent mistake or mere negligence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.