4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Erlinger v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Erlinger v. United States Anchor | green | “there is no efficiency exception to the fifth and sixth amendments.” | 9 |
| 2 | Guido v. Duane Morris LLP. | green | “a dissent, of course, is not precedent.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Rodriguez | green | “generally, facts which will aggravate the crime of which a defendant is accused and enhance the punishment to which he will be subject are said to be an 'element' of the offense, n.j.s.a. 2c:1-14(h), and must therefore be charged in the indictment.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Franklin | green | “that a defendant possessed a gun during the commission of a crime is a fact that must be presented to a grand jury and found by a petit jury beyond a reasonable doubt if the court intends to rely on it to impose a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.