2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hagans v. Lavine.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hagans v. Lavine Anchor | green | “he assertion that the claim involves question must be more than incantation.” | 12 |
| 2 | J. P. Murphy v. Inexco Oil Company, J. P. Murphy v. Inexco Oil Company | green | “he assertion that the claim involves question must be more than incantation.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.