5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gonzalez v. Thaler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gonzalez v. Thaler Anchor | green | “subject-matter jurisdiction can never be waived or forfeited.” | 12 |
| 2 | Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States | green | “hird-party beneficiary status is not reserved for those parties who benefit expressly under a given contract.” | 3 |
| 3 | City of Burbank, California v. United States | green | “the bpa markets, transmits, purchases, exchanges, and sells electric energy in the wholesale market. federal dams in the pacific northwest generate the hydroelectric energy the bpa sells in this market.” | 3 |
| 4 | Firstenergy Service Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “the statutory 'just and reasonable' standard is the same under section 205 and section 206.” | 3 |
| 5 | Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “under the express language of 206, however, ferc may not order refunds for any period prior to the filing of the complaint.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.