2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William Barr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William Barr Anchor | green | “the lack of time, date, and place in the nta sent to did not deprive the immigration court of jurisdiction over her case” | 21 |
| 2 | Pereira v. Sessions | green | “the lack of time, date, and place in the nta sent to did not deprive the immigration court of jurisdiction over her case” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.