6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from ESTATE OF.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ESTATE OF Anchor | green | “mere differences of opinion among medical personnel regarding a patient's appropriate treatment do not give rise to deliberate indifference.” | 6 |
| 2 | Clyde Ammons v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc. | green | “substantial compliance is not strict compliance.” | 4 |
| 3 | Nichols v. Michigan City Plant Planning Department | green | “trial court is obligated to give a liberal construction to a pro se plaintiff's filings.” | 4 |
| 4 | Oconomowoc Residential Programs, Incorporated v. City Of Milwaukee | green | “an accommodation is unreason- able if it imposes undue financial or administrative burdens or requires a fundamental alteration in the nature of the pro- gram.” | 3 |
| 5 | Michael C. Cichon v. Exelon Generation Company, L.L.C. | green | “a district court does not abuse its discretion when, in imposing a penalty for a litigant's non-compliance with local rule 56.1, the court chooses to ignore and not consider the ad- ditional facts that a litigant has proposed.” | 3 |
| 6 | A.H. ex rel. Holzmueller v. Illinois High School Ass'n | green | “while title ii and section 504 of the rehabilitation act lack such specific reasonable accommodation language, their corresponding regula- tions employ language indicating that entities must provide reasonable accommodations to the disabled.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.