Topic: if the case goes to trial, this plaintiff may fail to prove… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1312

7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co. Anchor
ca7 · 2009
green “if the case goes to trial, this plaintiff may fail to prove injury.” 4
2 Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ca11 · 2003
green “significantly, the existence of minor conflicts alone will not defeat a party's claim to class certification: the conflict must be a 'fundamental' one going to the specific issues in controversy.” 3
3 Joseph D. Adashunas, a Minor by His Parents, Alvin and Olga Adashunas, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Harold H. Negley
ca7 · 1980
green “in order to state a class action claim upon which relief can be granted, there must be alleged at the minimum (1) a reasonably defined class of plaintiffs, (2) all of whom have suffered a constitutional or statutory violation (3) inflicted by the defendants.” 3
4 In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices Litigation
ca3 · 1998
green “there is also ample evidence that each named party has suffered an 'injury in fact' . . . . thus, the named plaintiffs satisfy article iii. the absentee class members are not required to make a similar showing . . . .” 3
5 Rodriguez v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In Re Rodriguez)
ca5 · 2012
green “he possibility that some may fail to prevail on their individual claims will not defeat class membership.” 3
6 Moulton v. United States Steel Corp.
ca6 · 2009
green “rule 23 gives the district court broad discretion in handling class actions, authorizing 'orders that . . . impose conditions on the representative parties or on intervenors.” 3
7 International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. General Motors Corp.
ca6 · 2007
green “rule 23(e) does not require the notice to set forth every ground on which class members might object to the settlement . . . .” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check