5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co. Anchor | green | “the maxim noscitur a sociis, that a word is known by the company it keeps, while not an inescapable rule, is often wisely applied where a word is capable of many meanings in order to avoid the giving of unintended breadth to the acts of congress.” | 7 |
| 2 | Reves v. Ernst & Young | green | “congress' purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called.” | 6 |
| 3 | In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litigation | green | “we do not hold that whenever a corporation speaks, it must disclose every piece of information in its possession that could affect the price of its stock” | 3 |
| 4 | Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co. | green | “a word is known by the company it keeps” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.