7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from International Union Of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Pension, Welfare And Training Trust Funds v. Karr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | International Union Of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Pension, Welfare And Training Trust Funds v. Karr Anchor | green | “the fact that some different evidence may be presented in this action . . . , however, does not defeat the bar of res judicata” | 3 |
| 2 | Gabriel G. TORRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “if simply submitting new evidence rendered a prior decision factually distinct, res judicata would cease to exist” | 3 |
| 3 | Monahan v. New York City Department Of Corrections | green | “plaintiffs' assertion of new incidents arising from the application of the challenged policy is also insufficient to bar the application of res judicata” | 3 |
| 4 | Pearl Saylor v. United States | green | “the fact that . . . new evidence might change the outcome of the case does not affect application of claim preclusion doctrine” | 3 |
| 5 | McLaughlin v. Bradlee | green | “it is especially appropri ate to impose sanctions in situations where the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel plainly preclude relitigation of the suit” | 3 |
| 6 | Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services v. Abbott | green | “all of the major texas cities . . . continue to have multiple clinics where many physicians will have or obtain hospital admit- ting privileges” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.