6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Monahan v. New York City Department Of Corrections.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monahan v. New York City Department Of Corrections Anchor | green | “in the southern and eastern districts of new york, a party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall file a short and concise statement of the material facts in dispute accompanied by citation to evidence which would be admissible.” | 4 |
| 2 | Gadsden v. Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc. | green | “courts in this circuit have not hesitated to deem admitted the facts in a movant's local civil rule 56.1 statement that have not been controverted by a local civil rule 56.1 statement from the nonmoving party.” | 4 |
| 3 | Audio Emotion S/A v. McIntosh Group, Inc. | green | “we have recognized that the doctrine cannot apply absent continuity of ownership, which is the essence of a merger.” | 4 |
| 4 | Cargo Partner Ag v. Albatrans, Inc. And Chase, Leavitt (Customhouse Brokers) Inc. | green | “it is, by contrast, the nature of an asset sale that the seller's ownership interest in the entity is given up in exchange for consideration; the parties do not become owners together of what formerly belonged to each.” | 3 |
| 5 | New York v. National Service Industries, Inc. | green | “ecause continuity of ownership is the essence of a merger, a de facto merger will not be found in the absence of this element.” | 3 |
| 6 | Doktor v. Werner Co. | green | “ommon ownership does not exist where, as here, there is a sale of assets for cash.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.