7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Glory Truong v. Bank of America, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glory Truong v. Bank of America, N.A. Anchor | green | “there is, of course, no general rule that any claim that relies on a fraud allegation is an 'independent claim' for rooker-feldman purposes.” | 3 |
| 2 | Alexander Milchtein v. John Chisholm | green | “he phrase 'inextricably intertwined' ... should not be used as a ground of decision.” | 3 |
| 3 | Alexander Milchtein v. John Chisholm | green | “the vital question" the court asked in exxon "is whether the fed- eral plaintiff seeks the alteration of a state court's judgment.” | 3 |
| 4 | Katelyn Webb v. Chelsea Smith | green | “an important consideration for a court confronted with the issue of whether rooker-feldman applies is to analyze 'the effect the requested federal relief would have on the state court judgment.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Syed Ahmad | green | “a search au- thorized by consent is wholly valid.” | 3 |
| 6 | Bernstein v. Bankert | green | “the case law holds, consistent with rule 41(b), that a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction cannot be a dismissal with prej- udice.” | 3 |
| 7 | Sarah Hohenberg v. Shelby Cnty., Tenn. | green | “complaint demanding 'compensatory damages' does not 'seek review or reversal' of a court order awarding relief not measured by money.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.