Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 867 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James E. PASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James E. PASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “if an applicant's claim fails at any step of the process, the alj need not advance to the subsequent steps.” | 161 |
| 2 | Pamela D. Johnson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 159 |
| 3 | Pamela D. Johnson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “where conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ,” | 145 |
| 4 | Jimmy Radford v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “the record should include a discussion of which evidence the alj found credible and why, and specific application of the pertinent legal requirements to the record evidence.” | 126 |
| 5 | Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “the commissioner typically offers this evidence through the testimony of a vocational expert responding to a hypothetical that incorporates the claimant's limitations.” | 104 |
| 6 | George Monroe v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to his conclusion.” | 95 |
| 7 | Bird v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “when examining a social security administration disability determination, a reviewing court is required to uphold the determination when an alj has applied correct legal standards and the alj's factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” | 65 |
| 8 | Bird v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.