4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp. Anchor | green | “nfringement may cause a patentee irreparable harm not remediable by a reasonable royalty.” | 5 |
| 2 | ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp. | green | “the essential attribute of a patent grant is that it provides a right to exclude competitors from infringing the patent.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re EMC Corporation | green | “rule 20's two requirements . . . help ensure that the scope of the action remains consistent with fairness to the parties.” | 5 |
| 4 | Horton Co. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. | green | “the purpose of is to promote trial convenience and expedite the final resolution of disputes.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.