Topic: unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #150

8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 861 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gregg v. Georgia.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Gregg v. Georgia Anchor
scotus · 1976
green “unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain” 207
2 Gregory L. Rich v. Sergeant Michael Bruce, and Sewall Smith, Warden James Sanders James Peguese Lieutenant Grant Teresa Wilson-Bogans, Corporal
ca4 · 1997
green “true subjective recklessness requires knowledge both of the general risk, and also that the conduct is inappropriate in light of that risk.” 169
3 Eric A. Brice v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff John Nieves, Deputy Sheriff, and City of Virginia Beach
ca4 · 1995
green “actual knowledge or awareness on the part of the alleged inflicter . . . becomes essential to proof of deliberate indifference 'because prison officials who lacked knowledge of a risk cannot be said to have inflicted punishment.” 153
4 De'lontra v. Angelone
ca4 · 2003
green “scrutiny under the eighth amendment is not limited to those punishments authorized by statute and imposed by a criminal judgment.” 117
5 Gregg v. Georgia
scotus · 1976
green “involve the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.” 79
6 Parrish v. Cleveland
ca4 · 2004
green “true subjective recklessness requires knowledge both of the general risk, and also that the conduct is inappropriate in light of that risk.” 66
7 Albert Anderson v. M. Kingsley
ca4 · 2017
green “the prison official must have both 'subjectively recognized a substantial risk of harm' and 'subjectively recognized that his/her actions were inappropriate in light of that risk.” 55
8 Gregory L. Rich v. Sergeant Michael Bruce, and Sewall Smith, Warden James Sanders James Peguese Lieutenant Grant Teresa Wilson-Bogans, Corporal
ca4 · 1997
green “inappropriate in light of that risk.” 15

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check