11 canonical passages across 10 cases, quoted by 151 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Corber v. Massanari.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corber v. Massanari Anchor | green | “the final responsibility for determining rfc rests with the commissioner, and because the assessment is made based upon all the evidence in the record, not only the relevant medical evidence, it is well within the province of the alj.” | 35 |
| 2 | Oldham v. Astrue | green | “the alj provided good reasons in his decision for the weight he gave to the treating sources' opinions. nothing more was required in this case.” | 18 |
| 3 | Best-Willie v. Astrue | green | “having reasonably discounted the opinions of drs. hall and charlat, the alj did not err in failing to include additional limitations in her rfc assessment.” | 18 |
| 4 | Hill v. Astrue | green | “in determining the claimant's rfc, the alj is required to consider the effect of all of the claimant's medically determinable impairments, both those he deems 'severe' and those 'not severe.” | 15 |
| 5 | Robert M. Haddock v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “he alj must investigate and elicit a reasonable explanation for any conflict between the and expert testimony before the alj may rely on the expert's testimony as substantial evidence to support a determination of nondisability.” | 15 |
| 6 | Mary Hope CASIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee | green | “in evaluating the appeal, we neither reweigh the evidence nor substitute our judgment for that of the agency.” | 11 |
| 7 | Hackett v. Barnhart | green | “this level-two reasoning appears more consistent with plaintiff's rfc” | 10 |
| 8 | Stokes v. Astrue | green | “ms. stokes' second argument is that the alj's limitation to simple, repetitive and routine work should be construed as a limitation to jobs with a reasoning-level rating of one. we disagree.” | 10 |
| 9 | Adams v. Colvin | green | “an alj does not need to account for a limitation belied by the record when setting a claimant's rfc.” | 9 |
| 10 | Qualls v. Apfel | green | “in conducting our review, we may neither reweigh the evidence nor substitute our judgment for that of the commissioner.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.