2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Novak v. Kasaks.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Novak v. Kasaks Anchor | green | “where plaintiffs contend defendants had access to contrary facts, they must specifically identify the reports or statements containing this information.” | 12 |
| 2 | United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit | green | “plaintiffs' unsupported general claim of the existence of confidential company sales reports that revealed the larger decline in sales is insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.