5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency Anchor | green | “the remedy for denial of action that might be sought from one agency does not ordinarily provide an 'adequate remedy' for action already taken by another agency.” | 4 |
| 2 | Youn J. Lee v. Alberto R. Gonzales Nuria Prendes, Field Officer in Charge of Detention and Removal, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement | green | “petitioner must exhaust available avenues of relief and turn to habeas only when no other means of judicial review exists.” | 4 |
| 3 | McCullen v. Coakley | green | “plaintiff generally cannot prevail on an as-applied challenge without showing that the law has in fact been (or is sufficiently likely to be) unconstitutionally applied to him.” | 4 |
| 4 | Garcia v. Vilsack | green | “the relevant question under the apa . . . is not whether are as effective as an apa lawsuit against the regulating agency, but whether the private suit remedy provided by congress is adequate.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Low Hong | green | “a mere claim of citizenship, made in a petition for the writ of habeas corpus by one held under such process, cannot be given the effect of arresting the progress of the administrative proceeding provided for.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.