3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes Anchor | green | “the key to the (b)(2) class is the indivisible nature of the injunctive or declaratory remedy warranted-the notion that the conduct is such that it can be enjoined or declared unlawful only as to all of the class members or as to none of them.” | 8 |
| 2 | Gregory Berry v. LexisNexis Risk and Information | green | “the court finds that certification of the rule 23(b)(2) class in this case is appropriate because the injunctive relief sought is indivisible and applicable to all members of the rule 23(b)(2) class.” | 5 |
| 3 | In re Lupron Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation | green | “the storm warnings indicative of collusion are a 'lack of significant discovery and extremely expedited settlement of questionable value accompanied by an enormous legal fee.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.