3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. Bowen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. Bowen Anchor | green | “cannot pick and choose evidence that supports a particular conclusion.” | 9 |
| 2 | Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social Security | green | “he alj cannot arbitrarily substitute his own judgment for competent medical opinion.” | 5 |
| 3 | Cabibi v. Colvin | green | “a claimant need not be an invalid to be found disabled.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.