5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William J. Plott v. State of Florida.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William J. Plott v. State of Florida Anchor | green | “e hold that upward departure sentences that are unconstitutionally enhanced in violation of apprendi and blakely patently fail to comport with constitutional limitations, and consequently, the sentences are illegal under rule 3.800(a).” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Collins | green | “habitual offender sentencing is now separate from both the sentencing guidelines and sentencing under the .” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Hall | green | “although it is true that exceeds the statutory maximum sentence for a single grand theft, it does not exceed ms. hall's maximum sentence under her scoresheet, which is ten years' imprisonment.” | 3 |
| 4 | Fudge v. State | green | “isdemeanors cannot be scored as primary offenses at conviction.” | 3 |
| 5 | Silvera v. State | green | “he sentences imposed by the trial court in this case exceeded those authorized by the .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.